[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Corum's new paper, a "naive swindle"?
At 11:36 AM 4/12/00 -0600, you wrote:
>Original Poster: "Benkanosan" <benkanosan@townsqr.com>
>
>HI, Y'ALL
[snip]
>How is it
>that so much negative energy is directed toward his work? If one disagrees
>with a scientist's position, ad hominum argumentation is usually not the way
>to express the correctness of an opposing theory ("naive swindle" - wow,
>that's pretty nasty talk!) Am I missing something in all this that more
>experienced coilers can clue me in on? Thanks, guys (and gals). Happy
>coiling!
>Noah
Uhhh, if I understand it correctly, the term "naive swindle" was used by
the Corums to describe the lumped-parameter model of Tesla-coiling. The
"nasty talk", as you say, came from *them* ;)
Happy coiling to you too!
Dan
ntesla@ntesla.cs.dsc.edu