[Home][2020 Index]
I have imagined that using a high powered (5mw) laser would create an ionized channel through the atmosphere for streamers to follow. I wonder if anybody has done this, yet? David Thomson On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 11:40 AM David Varas via Tesla <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We are debating in a social network, if the length of a serpentine > requires a much lower voltage than theorized due to the channel of ionized > gas that it is generating and that reduces the energy expenditure of said > discharge.I argue that that theory has overlooked some issues.Is true, > beyond a few tens of centimeters, the development of an electric arc cannot > be simplified to a directly proportional relationship (an ascending > straight line on an x-y diagram) because it becomes very complex and many > variables are involved. It is also true that each discharge pulse leaves an > open channel of ionized gas that makes the next discharge not need as much > energy to reach the point where the previous discharge was extinguished, > and that reserve of "unspent" energy allows it to reach a little further > than the previous one, and so on. So you might think that in the end, a > streamer can reach a distance x (for example 3.3m) driven by a voltage much > smaller than the theoretical one based o > n that directly proportional relationship. But streamers are not a > one-line channel of constant thickness and directionality (like a tube or > cable). Streamers behave like lightning in a storm. In a storm, the > discharge, with an average length of 10 km, falls with a stepped structure, > approx. every 45 meters, it branches and / or changes direction, > dissipating a large amount of energy. Similarly, the discharge that > originates in the toroid, branches and / or changes direction. and it is in > those events where it loses the energy that "supposedly was going to be > saved" and even more, what in the end would give rise to a discharge of > length x (example 3.3 m) that actually needed to be driven by a voltage > even greater than that theorized by calculations, due to all the energy > that was dissipated in the route, and that was not used to generate and > maintain that channel of ionized gas. > > David Varas > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list > Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla > _______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla