User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
That's a good idea Ed that hadn't occurred to us!
Phil
On 10/12/17 17:13, Ed wrote:
Can't answer your question but had the thought that filling in the
space between the spokes by adding a disk of chicken wire or any other
cheap galvanized wire cloth would emulate a solid metal plate. Even
cheaper but ugly would be to use aluminum foil wrap, maybe supported
by corrugated paper sheet.
Ed
On 12/10/2017 2:22 AM, phil wrote:
All,
I'm currently assisting in the construction of a ring type toroid
(60" x 12") consisting of six tubes (
https://www.flickr.com/photos/33962508@N03/ ). Using Dr. Antônio
Carlos M. de Queiroz's 'Inca' program (
http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/programs/ ) and, along with some help in
its actual use from Bert Hickman, I now have a good idea of the
expected toroid's capacitance.
Now the six rings or hoops obviously need supporting in free space,
and the conventional toroid method is a solid central disc in the
horizontal plane supporting the outside minor diameter tube.
I wondered just how much this solid central disc contributes to the
shielding of the secondary, and if its replacement with support arms
(like wheel spokes - but only four of them at 12, 3, 6, 9 o'clock)
would leave the secondary more exposed to strikes, than if a solid
disc had been used?
(The effect on the capacitance value is believed to be small, so left
out of the decision.)