[Home][2014 Index]
Jim, I'll concede your points.However, if you are having spikes big enough to deplete MOVs in a short time, the rectifier diodes won't stand a chance.
It can be prudent to put a suitable fuse in series with each MOV to guard against short circuit failures. Of course, you have to watch the fuses, 'cause if they blow, then you lose the protection of the MOVs.
Do any TC builders run their coils through GFI circuits? To my understanding, a TC is a granddaddy of a ground fault when in normal operation.
Dave On 3/7/2014 6:25 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
On 3/7/14 2:02 PM, David Speck wrote:Dave, I would also place suitably rated, beefy MOVs across the input and output leads of the bridge, and possibly across each individual leg of the bridge. Rearranging the wiring have caused the system to pick up RF in a new way that is blowing the bridge.MOVs in a system where there are spikes all the time is a recipe for disaster. Each time they clamp, they die a little, and conduct a bit more leakage current. I learned that on the 3 phase motor drive scenario.. Kill a big fat MOV in hours.If you want a clamp, use a gas tube type or a semiconductor device. They can clamp millions of impulses.I'd also place suitably rated 0.1 uF ceramic disc caps across each leg of the bridge to bypass stray RF. Electrolytic caps are too slow to protect against RF at TC frequencies.0.1 uF will result in some noticeable leakage at 60 Hz. It's about 27k impedance, so you get about 10 mA. Probably not a big deal in this application, but it's more than enough to trip a GFCI.Series L might be a better approach to filtering. _______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla