[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[TCML] MMC Design

To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [TCML] MMC Design
From: "Tim Flood" <tflood@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:44:56 -0500
Delivered-to: teslaarchive@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://www.pupman.com/pipermail/tesla>
List-help: <mailto:tesla-request@pupman.com?subject=help>
List-id: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla.pupman.com>
List-post: <mailto:tesla@pupman.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla>, <mailto:tesla-request@pupman.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla>, <mailto:tesla-request@pupman.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx

One MMC capacitor chart states: "Warning!! Never use "Resonant" cap values anymore!!! Use "LTR" instead to keep from damaging NSTs!!! For my application of 15/120 the value would be .0553uF with a sync. gap.

The other chart calls for "Resonant Cap" for a syn. gap. The value from this chart for 15/120 is .0214uF.

Any opinions?

Thanks,

Tim
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TCML] MMC Design
  - From: Futuret

Prev by Date: [TCML] Wintesla
Next by Date: RE: [TCML] Wintesla
Previous by thread: Re: [TCML] Wintesla
Next by thread: Re: [TCML] MMC Design
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread