Re: [TCML] CW magnifier

["Carlos Van Camp" <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi phillip,
The arcs I am getting now are about 30-35" long with a CW input of 25-30kw. 
(the machine is capable of 50kw continuously)
There are 6 electrodes on the secondary top load, each producing its own 
brush of arcs.
They are like thick flames of plasma which branch into many tendrils of fat 
bolts.
The problem is I need 2-3 times this to make the art piece asthetically 
pleasing and functional.
To ad to the problem, the coil is also sound modulated... So Going pulsed 
instead of CW means losing some sound quality in order to gain spark 
length...
I have no experience with pulsed valve coils, but have started down the 
track of making an audio interface circuit that converts the audio into a 
controlled square wave to feed onto the valve.(my electronics knowledge is 
pretty basic)
I am not sure at this point weather to follow conventional thought, and 
pulse the cathode to ground, or to follow my gut, and drive the grid of the 
valve with bursts of rf (at the appropriate frequency of course)...

Carlos

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phillip Slawinski" <pslawinski@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Tesla Coil Mailing List" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [TCML] CW magnifier


> Carlos,
>
> What kind of performance do you "need", and what are you getting now?
> Quasi-continuous mode coils are different than transient mode coils where
> you can just keep pushing power into the coil to get longer sparks.  With
> QCW coils you reach a point where greater power input will only lead to
> streamer splitting, and branching.  To effectively make long QCW sparks 
> you
> need to carefully control the top voltage so that the streamer does not
> split or branch.  You can't get that sort of control from a simple
> transformer and doubler arrangement (typical in many VTTCs).  The best I
> have been able to do with MOTs and a doubler on my coil was 35".
>
> -Phillip Slawinski
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 22:43, Carlos Van Camp 
> <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > wrote:
>
> > Thanks everyone for the feed back.
> > Yes, I take your point about the CW coil already increasing the coupling,
> > so your probably right... No real advantage to going to a magnifier...
> > My main reason was the ever search for longer arcs! I have a large CW 
> > coil
> > (valve driven) that is not putting out the arc length I need, so I am 
> > just
> > looking for ways to improve it...
> > I am not ready to go down the full electronic driven path at this point 
> > and
> > I dont think I have the knowledge to pull it off anyway.
> > So I will stick to my valves, and look at pulsing it to improve output...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Carlos
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla 

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla