[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] CD942 Capacitor failure



Hi Phil,

Interesting post. I have had only one 942C failure similar in description (blackened hole half way down). I never did figure out the cause. Looking at your cap string (as the current is the same in each string) then roughly 14 amps which is not bad. However, that is based on 120 bps. If your are running higher bps (say 240), then the rms current increases to about 20 amps as does heating. So I'm wondering if anything along the lines of bps has changed as it could be a possible cause.

Take care,
Bart

Phil Tuck wrote:
Hello,

I have suffered several CD942 cap failures lately and I am wondering on the
cause. Each time it has just been the one isolated cap. I would not have
thought that my voltage was excessive for these caps, but after consulting
with another coiler, I am now wondering about a primary current issue.

I was running a SRSG on a pig rated at 11.55Kv but running at 12Kv at times.
Secondary current is around 400 to 450ma depending on my ballast setting.

I was using nine strings of 19 in series giving 71nF @ 38Kv. Damage to the
caps was an exterior blackened hole where the blowout had occurred. I
unwound the last cap' to find where the damage had occurred, this turned out
to be about half way down into the cap in its middle layers. The damage at
this point being a circular hole about 0.25-inch diameter.

Safety gap was set at 9mm or 0.354 inches at the time with the coil running
very smoothly for 3 minutes or more while producing some nice streamers. The
dv/dt time should not have been exceeded either as the res frequency is 92
KHz.
The primary was tapped at about 8 turns I think, but he primary coil itself
only ever feels slightly warm while the wiring temperature seems to remain
unchanged.

Admittedly, none of the caps are now new, as I have used them on previous
set-ups before, but I would not say they have ever been abused, as the MMC
voltage ratings they have been used in have always been adequate.

As none of the damage was from proximity issues, it can only really be down
to voltage or current I suppose. Thoughts anyone?

Phil

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla