[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCML] Re: Dummy load for optimum cap size Experimentation
Gary,
Perhaps you could use the peak voltage for your measurement instead? Just
need to add a rectifier and measure peak DC voltage.
-Phillip Slawinski
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 14:11, Gary Lau <glau1024@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm making slow but steady progress in my experiment to determine the best
> cap size based on using a halogen lamp dummy in place of a primary, and
> monotoring the light intensity to indicate how much power is being
> processed.
>
> I'm recording the power at 120V and at full Variac setting. The full
> Variac
> setting is typically ~135V under load. It changes slightly depending on
> the
> cap value, but it is what it is. When I set the Variac to get 120V, I
> monitored the voltage with both a Wavetec 27XT DMM, and an old lab-quality
> Weston analog meter, calibrated at the 120V point with the 27XT, with 120V
> from the Variac, under no load.
>
> But when the Variac is under load from the NST, there can be a significant
> difference between the two meters (113V vs. 120V). I'm speculating that
> this is due to the loaded Variac output waveform being distorted, and the
> two meters see this differently.
>
> I don't own a true-RMS meter, so I have to decide which of these two
> readings to believe. I have been using the analog meter. Can anyone
> suggest which one might be closer to a true-RMS value?
>
> Thanks, Gary Lau
> MA, USA
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla