[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] + 30mA = dead garage door opener

I've got a line filter. 20A.  Oriented the "right" way - meaning the way it says printed on the thing itself.
I like the ideas of MOVs.   And I'll add some chokes.

All good suggestions and I plan to implement them.

I've amped up the coil again.  Now running 15/150 with 71nF tank cap.  0.25/0.25 primary tapped at about the 5th turn after a 2.5 inch spacing between the bottom turn of the secondary and the first turn of the primary.

Results are quite positive.  Following JavaTC's specs are helping quite a lot.  I'm over on the cap by about 4nf, and I'm tuned out on the 5th turn instead of the 4.7th turn.  But the sparks are impressive and now I appear to be interfering with the rest of my home electronics.  The coil is still in the garage, but so is the romex bus that feeds the entire house with line current.  No hits on the bus yet, but it's got to be in the electric field.  So there have to be induced currents.

I've noticed the behavior of the sparks is much  more "usual" with the tuning done properly.  None of this kind of spastic, stroboscopic jumping from place to place.  I mean, the sparks are in general, spastic - but it's a slower progression when everything is humming.

Though my home wiring is taking a beating.  I fear what will happen when I move beyond NSTs to a pole pig or a powerful DRSSTC.

Got to run in the driveway from now on.


On Aug 14, 2010, at 10:49 AM, DC Cox wrote:

> Put some MOVs on the 120 vac feeding the garage door opener.
> Do you have MOVs, a good 20 Amp line filter, and some small inductors on the
> pri side of your NST?  This will also help.
> Dr. Resonance
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Joe Mastroianni <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>> Blew up my garage door opener last eve.  I'm still not comfortable with
>> rolling the coil out into the driveway.  I put a vent fan in the roof of the
>> garage, in fact, to evacuate the O3 & NOx, so I wouldn't have to coil in
>> public.   I went as far as unplugging the opener whenever I ran my tests.
>> Alas - even unplugged, the opener couldn't take it.
>> I had expected the radio would overload or maybe the front end filters
>> would fry.  Not a chance.  I am subscribing to the "ain't much RF from a
>> coil" theories proffered on this site.
>> I am still running the 4.5" x 22" secondary with double toroids - a 3x12 at
>> 23 inches and a 4.5x18 at 28 inches as measured from the bottom of the
>> secondary.  All of my prior coupling problems were solved on the last go
>> around with help from Bart  and JavaTC. (things go infinitely easier when
>> you have the expert at hand )   I am now running the secondary with the base
>> in the same plane as the primary - no altitude adjustment necessary, now
>> that I've carved 2.5 turns out of the inside of the primary.
>> The sequence of events is this - I acquired a new 15/60 NST.   Previously I
>> had been running a 15/60 in parallel with a 15/30.   I swapped out the 15/30
>> for the new 15/60, figuring I'd ramp up the power in increments so I could
>> observe the effects with my SRSG based coil.
>> Now effectively running 15/120,  I did not increase the primary cap tank.
>> I plan to do that this weekend.  Slowly increasing the variac I noticed two
>> effects:
>> 1) The SRSG timing was ever so slightly off now.  Where before it was
>> running perfectly with no phase adjustment, I had to kick in about 3-5
>> degrees (my estimate based on prior measurements with this Freau phaser
>> arrangement) to get all electrodes to fire reliably.  Undoubtedly the added
>> amperage filled those caps faster,  and possibly inductance of the
>> additional NST changed the phase a bit.
>> 2) No safety gaps fired until  I got to about 2/3 power, but I had not
>> readjusted them with the new NST, so there's no surprise here.
>> 3) The streamers were far more "energetic", and what I mean by that is that
>> where before a streamer would form and stick around for some fraction of a
>> second before evaporating and being replaced by another - they
>> stick-around-time of the streamers was shorter.    Overall streamer length
>> was about the same at 2/3 power as full power before, and this is a
>> qualitative measure, but it seemed within the realm of what might be
>> expected with a potential 33% increase in rated input current.  Of course,
>> the actual increase in current depends on the loading of the NSTs. Tilbury
>> has some curves in his book suggesting a very linear inverse relationship
>> between NST output V and I with a dV/dI of somewhere in the neighborhood of
>> -0.3, (actual equation:  Vo(kV) = -0.3*Io(mA) + 0.9798 ) suggesting that at
>> max rated current the output V would be under 10% of rated output.
>> I did take care to unplug the opener, and I had in fact even wrapped the
>> power cord around an RF choke.  Alas, this precaution was a completely inept
>> attempt. The streamers energized the garage door spring, which is connected
>> directly to the gantry holding the garage door opener motor + controller +
>> drive belt.   Some currents must have flowed through that gantry into the
>> housing of the opener itself.  The effect is that the door will now only
>> open.  The opener only closes the door on occasion (during which time it
>> appears to functional normally).   The radio control is unaffected, which
>> leads me to believe there is no RF-induced damage.  It's strictly a streamer
>> hit.
>> Oddly, the streamers also hit the wiring for the garage door IR sensor.
>> Those seem to function normally as well during my tests.
>> My opener is a Chamberlain model 3280.  It appears from the code it is
>> throwing that either the RPM sensor or the logic board itself is fried.  I
>> have ordered replacements for both, as the components are significantly
>> cheaper than the whole motor (e.g. ~ $80 + shipping).
>> When the replacement parts arrive I will dismantle the unit and see if
>> there is any obvious spark damage visible.  My greatest fear is that what
>> has happened is that one of the limit switches has been somehow compromised
>> and that the parts I replace have nothing to do with the failure - and that
>> the problem can be solved by simply bending a contact back into place.   But
>> I dont have the patience to dismantle the opener in the absence of any
>> repair parts.  So that experiment will wait till later this week.
>> Cheers,
>> Joe_______________________________________________
>> Tesla mailing list
>> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla

Tesla mailing list