[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCML] Spark gaps (again)
My guess :
Strong airflow might be counterproductive in low powered coils powered up to 100-200 W.Stretching the arcs,increasing their resistance,or quenching arcs even too early.
Multisegment gap is capable of fine quencing without additional help.Single gap ,if the electrodes are smooth and large enough,very good too.
I suspect that very fast rotary gap could be even worse than ordinary static gap.
DD.
--- jpeakall@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: "Jonathan Peakall" <jpeakall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Tesla Coil Mailing List" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [TCML] Spark gaps (again)
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:07:09 -0800
Neat discussion. Makes me want to ask this question:
I found that a multi-segment gap worked better for low power coils, like an
OBIT or automotive ignition coil. The single gap was waaaay better for NST
powered coils. I did try low to high air flow over a single gap for the low
power coils, but I could never get better performance than with the multi
gap. Any ideas why? Is this because of physics, or was it just something
about my particular setup?
Jonathan
www.madlabs.info
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some people are like a Slinky .. not really good for anything,
but you still can’t help but smile when you shove them down the stairs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dex Dexter" <dexterlabs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Tesla Coil Mailing List" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [TCML] Spark gaps (again)
> The thing are the resistances of gap arc columns.
> They are not the same I think becouse the impulse arc has the expansive
> evolution.
> How much they differ I don't know :(
> Any proof for that?
>
> Dex
>
> --- jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> From: jimlux <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [TCML] Spark gaps (again)
> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:30:25 -0800
>
> Dex Dexter wrote:
>> I guess the 'arc column' voltage drop must be considerably higher in
>> a pulsed transient arc lasting for 10-20 microseconds than in a
>> steady state arc of the same lenght and current.How much higher I
>> don't know.Catode drops should be the same in both cases.Yes/No?
>
> Cathode drop would be the same.
> The arc column heats up in microseconds (viz camera flash), so I don't
> know that TC arcs are all that different than a free-burning arc.
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> Washington DC's Largest FREE Email service. --->
> http://www.DCemail.com ---> A Washington Online Community Member --->
> http://www.DCpages.com
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_____________________________________________________________
Washington DC's Largest FREE Email service. ---> http://www.DCemail.com ---> A Washington Online Community Member --->
http://www.DCpages.com
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla