Re: [TCML] final word on inductance

[piranha <piranha@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think we had better perhaps "re-learn" what inductance is if there was 
ever any doubt. :D If we don't get that straight, then everything else 
will fall apart too. It may seem silly, but it is extremely important 
not go messing up the basic fundamentals of the sport.

Terry


Lau, Gary wrote:
> It would be nice if one could state a fact and have everyone instantly recognize that, and be done with it.  But that just isn't human nature.  And I didn't name this thread, so don't blame me!
>
> At issue in this and related threads are core issues to what it is we do.  How is inductance defined and what affects it, I would have hoped, were long ago understood and agreed upon, but apparently not ;-)  And more significantly, a new technique for improving the technology of DRSSTC's was announced, described, demonstrated, and held up for peer review.  Even if not everyone recognizes that it works, the discussion of it will add light to the topic for those who wish to understand it better.
>
> Regards, Gary Lau
> TCML Co-moderator
>
>
>
>   
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of mddeming@xxxxxxx
> > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:11 PM
> > To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [TCML] final word on inductance
> >
> > Dear Moderator,
> >
> > When will the long-awaited final word promised in the topic title come to pas?
> >
> > Matt D.
> >     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla