Thanks Jim, that gets me to wondering, if at some point, pressure might work
better than vacuum?
Are there any more considerations than just overheating of the electrodes? I
know that proper quenching is the real goal and keeping the electrode
temperature as low as possible is essential for that, but could a single static gap
quench at multi-kilowatt power levels if kept cool enough?
Which brings to mind this question: Is there anything like a tungsten flat
washer available anywhere? If so, how about brazing one on to the face of each
copper cap electrode?
Tony Greer
*************
Sfxneon@xxxxxxx wrote:
Hi All,
I'm curious about the spark lengths achieved by others using a single
static
vacuum aspirated gap, (I believe the one designed by Gary Lau if memory
serves)? It uses a vacuum cleaner motor, PVC pipe and two large copper
tubing end
caps with holes in the middle for the electrodes.
What are the limiting factors with this type of gap? Can it be scaled up
for
higher power? It's a beautifully simple and elegant design, without the
need
for any close tolerance machine work like with rotaries, and it's much
safer
too.
In a message dated 9/7/2008 12:04:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
The literature has references to gaps of this type (generally, not with
the specific construction you describe) running at multiple kilowatt
power levels. The Marx blast gap is a good example. It actually used
air blowing out through the center hole in the electrode.
**************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog,
plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com.
(http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla