[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCML] PFC Question (again)
In a message dated 5/26/2008 5:06:42 P.M. US Eastern Standard Time,
bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>Hi John,
>I agree. I see PIG's as mostly STR on average and PT''s somewhere in the
>middle. They could all do well to run LTR, but I simply doubt that is
>the norm.
>As far as this subject line, I don't know if PFC will help. Too many
>variables.
>Take care,
>Bart
Hi Bart,
I did some power factor tests back when, but I forget all the results. All
I remember for sure is that the power factor for PT's running resonant or
near resonant at 120 bps was excellent. I remember reading an article
in TCBA News about some guys that built larger coil running with a
async rotary, and they mentioned that the power factor was not very good.
They were probably running STR, and they expressed the desirability of
adding some power factor correction, however they didn't attempt to do this.
In any case it would be easy to do some PFC tests by trying various
cap values to see if it reduces the apparent power draw for STR systems.
I'm surprised coilers haven't done more tests in that area.
Cheers,
John
**************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with
Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.
(http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla