[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>*Subject*: RE: [TCML] RF Ground and Brass*From*: "McCauley, Daniel H" <daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>*Date*: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:51:06 -0500*Cc*:*Delivered-to*: teslaarchive@xxxxxxxxxx*Delivered-to*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*In-reply-to*: <3CD6DBBF1B0B644AA0D50B40E7B93030433FD13E20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*List-archive*: <http://www.pupman.com/pipermail/tesla>*List-help*: <mailto:tesla-request@www.pupman.com?subject=help>*List-id*: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla.www.pupman.com>*List-post*: <mailto:tesla@www.pupman.com>*List-subscribe*: <http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla>, <mailto:tesla-request@www.pupman.com?subject=subscribe>*List-unsubscribe*: <http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla>, <mailto:tesla-request@www.pupman.com?subject=unsubscribe>*Reply-to*: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>*Sender*: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx*Thread-index*: AciAFbDEn4k7bzOWR7KyB4BHW2IkNQATWdCQAAHzzmA=*Thread-topic*: [TCML] RF Ground and Brass

Correct. The sine wave you see is NOT a constant sine wave. Its a ramping sine wave (not sure what the official name would be) For example, the first sine period might be 1A, the second 2A, and so on . . . until it reaches a peak. Dan Hi Bart, Sorry, but a peak secondary base current of 5A on a disruptive coil does not at all equate to an RMS current of 3.85A. It does not help to say that the current is time dependant, even though it is. The definition and common use of "RMS" does not allow for that. Only if the secondary current was a flat, CW 5A sinusoid could one say that it has an RMS current of 3.85A. One way of looking at RMS current is that if the highly irregular base current is in fact 350mA RMS, then that current flowing through a light bulb or resistor would heat it to the same degree as a steady DC current of 350mA. A 5 Amp sinusoid flowing through a light bulb would heat the filament to the same degree as a 3.85A DC current. That's why RMS is used - it provides a DC or steady-state equivalent. If my base current was actually several Amps RMS, then I would have blown out my flashlight bulb, so there is no doubt that that measurement is in the ballpark. Unless you have a digital scope that can render a true RMS value, a bolometric metering solution (i.e. light bulb with time-averaging light sensor, or resistor with thermistor), or an accurate waveform simulator that can calculate the RMS value, the best that you can do is to just state the peak current. Proclaiming an RMS value based only on the peak value of an irregular waveform can be nothing more than wrong and misleading. Regards, Gary Lau MA, USA > -----Original Message----- > From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of bartb > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 12:38 AM > To: Tesla Coil Mailing List > Subject: Re: [TCML] RF Ground and Brass > > Gary, > > Yes, Terry's value is 10Ap-p, 5Ap, 3.85A rms. Is that better? I simply > grabbed the page to link in the post (simply to show several amps of > base current) [I hope I still understand base current otherwise I will > go back to school and shoot my the teachers and burn my books.]. I > guess I should have deduced detail so I could have said "3.85A rms" on > Terry's coil! > > I don't know how many times now I have said "time dependent". At least > 3 or 4 emails now. I've said all I can about that. > > An rms value in the mA range: Is that Ambient temp dependent? Current > dependent? BPS dependent? Energy dependent? Base current dependent? > Lead length dependent? Wire size dependent? > > Answer = All of the above. > > Are you "so" sure mA range or is this just a number from Terry's email > you listed? > > Now your going to have to measure for yourself and deduce all of the > above in the process. > > Bart > > > > OK, looking at Terry's paper, I see the waveform you refer to. The > > Peak > secondary base current is 5 Amps, not 10. But I think you may have an > incorrect understanding of RMS current. If one has a _continuous_ > sine wave with a peak current of 10 Amps, the RMS current is 7.07Amps. > But as you know, the secondary current in a disruptive coil is not > continuous. It has a low duty cycle of something roughly like 1%, and > even during the bang-time, the amplitude envelope is very complex. > There is no simple conversion between the 5A peak current in Terry's > waveform, and the RMS current. The BPS, coupling, and quench time all > factor heavily into the RMS current. There are ways to measure RMS > current, the best being with a digital scope that does a lot of > number-crunching over a time interval that includes both the bang on > and off times. Measuring the brightness of an incandescent bulb also > works, because it has a sufficiently long thermal time constant to > kind of average the current over the bang on and off times. But the > key is that you need to look at a waveform over a time interval where > it repeats. That's how a waveform with a peak current of many Amps > can have an RMS value in the mA range. You can't just look at the > peak value and deduce the RMS value. It's the RMS current that correlates to how much wire heating will occur. If you're writing tools that purport to give RMS results, it's important to understand what that means. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list > Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla _______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla _______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla

**References**:**RE: [TCML] RF Ground and Brass***From:*Lau, Gary

- Prev by Date:
**RE: [TCML] RF Ground and Brass** - Next by Date:
**[TCML] RF Grounding** - Previous by thread:
**RE: [TCML] RF Ground and Brass** - Next by thread:
**Re: [TCML] RF Ground and Brass** - Index(es):