[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[TCML] Re: Maxwell #31915 colossal pulse caps
Hey again,
Never mind my question about cap's life expectancy
at reduced voltages, unless you'd like to comment
anyhow ;^) There are X-Y graphs regarding applied
voltage vs.life expectancy rating and 20% V-reversals
at the bottom of the same GA webpage that I linked.
http://www.gaep.com/series-s-ss-capacitors.html
David
----- Original Message -----
From: David Rieben
To: Tesla list
Cc: David Rieben
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 3:38 PM
Subject: Maxwell #31915 colossal pulse caps
Hi all,
I am now the proud papa of 3 newly acquired Maxwell #31915
100 kV, .44 uF (that's right -- 440 nF!) pulse caps with one
more on the way ;^)). Here is an eBay listing of one of these units:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=360079598908&ih=023&category=4662&ssPageName=STORE:PROMOBOX:NEWLIST#LIST
They are of a pretty rotund design with dimensions of 4" x 6"
x 29" long and weigh just over 32 lbs. each. Although I can't
seem to find an exact part number match, I was able to find
some specs from GA's current line of pulse caps that did
seem to have a pretty close match to these. I looked up on
General Atomics' (since GA bought out Maxwell) webpage
for some specs on these on the closest cap in the way of
voltage, capacitance and physical dimensions and found:
http://www.gaep.com/series-s-ss-capacitors.html
Notice the #31427. It is of the same size physical dimensions
and weight as mine and has a nearly identical voltage/capacitance
rating of 100 kV @ .4 uF. Notice though that it is rated for 1 pps ap-
plication and is only rated for a 15,000 shot life. However, I am
thinking of someday seriesing 2 or 3 of these units for a super
Tesla coil cap in the .16 to .24 uF range. It seems to me that
with a 200 or 300 kV ceiling voltage rating, these should be pretty
much bullet proof in a large Tesla coil circuit, even with very re-
latively high primary voltages, say 40 kV or more, since the shot
life expectancy goes up almost logarithmically in proportion to a
decrease in the applied voltage, doesn't it? Maybe Bert Hickman
or Antonio Quieros (spelling?) could clarify here. (hint --- :^)
I suppose about the only other possible limiting factor would
be the RMS current levels.
Also, the "measured C" that's on the label is generally about
.48 uF for each cap and my measurements of them so far
has verified a pretty close match - probably measures out to
around 8 to 12 nFd less than what the label says.
Anyway, tell me what you all think.
David
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla