RE: Aluminium Wire (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:16:58 +0000
From: david baehr <dfb25@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Aluminium Wire  (fwd)


Great info, Thankyou !!!!

> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 06:41:48 -0600> From:
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: Aluminium Wire (fwd)>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007
07:42:06 -0400> From: "Lau, Gary" <Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>> To: Tesla list
<tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>> Subject: RE: Aluminium Wire (fwd)> > Yes, I believe
that aluminum being "bad" for RF is just one of those> myths that won't
die. I performed an exhaustive test of various primary> conductor
geometries, including Al vs. Cu wire. Aside from the DC> resistance being
different, the Al primary did not exhibit any> surprising increases in AC
resistance as I swept from 40 KHz to 800 KHz.> See
http://www.laushaus.com/tesla/primary_resistance.htm> > Regards, Gary Lau>
MA, USA> _________________________________________________________________
Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger 
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline