Re: coupling losses ? (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:57:20 +0100
From: Chris Swinson <list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: coupling losses ? (fwd)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 2:28 PM
Subject: coupling losses ? (fwd)


>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:52:56 -0400
> From: Jared Dwarshuis <jdwarshuis@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Pupman <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: coupling losses ? (fwd)
>
> *coupling losses ? (fwd)*
>
> Once people get an idea in their head there is little point in talking 
> sense
> to them. "More is Better" is all that is fixed in their mind!
>
>
> Jared Dwarshuis
>
>


Actually no. What brought "myself" to that statement was that when I place 2 
coils further apart, the "coupling" is less, and the voltage drops. 
Apparently this is not the case with Tesla Coils. If Tesla coils have 
100watts to transfer and need 10 cycles, this suggests that there is 10watts 
per cycle. Or energy in = energy out.

However, what is the difference now that when I move my small 12V 100khz 
resonant coils further apart that the voltage drops ? That was the reasoning 
behind my question.


Chris