[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Secondary frequency (fwd)

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Secondary frequency (fwd)
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:42:28 -0600 (MDT)
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path: <mod1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:42:29 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <d5hiVtZDPGF.A.ifC.1w78GB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:22:24 -0400
From: Jared Dwarshuis <jdwarshuis@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Pupman <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Secondary frequency

The coil I am designing is based on the CSN book based on what Tesla said.
Though so far it turns out 100% backwards to how current classic coils are
built. I have however convinced myself that classic tesla coils are built
wrong, but I am keeping quiet until I can actually back it up with factual
hardware ;-)

What exactly is factual hardware?

Prev by Date: Re: troubleshooting tesla coil, continued (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: calculating copper plate indutance (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: Archive access?
Next by thread: coupling losses ? (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread