[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 20:00:29 -0600 (MDT)
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path: <mod1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 20:00:30 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <j8tp1XM4n8F.A.NVF.-kh2GB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 05:37:27 -0700
From: Barton B. Anderson <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: V11.1 for JAVATC

Hi Tony, All,

I've got a correction to make: "I mentioned doubling the bps to the 
reduce LTR value". This is NOT correct. Please disregard that part of my 
post.

I was researching that area again today and realized altering bps is not 
going to change the LTR value for an RSG. The equation for LTR when 
running an RSG is [0.83*(Iout/(2*hz)/Vout] and the (2*hz) portion is 
"NOT" representing BPS but simply half cycles.

Take care,
Bart

Prev by Date: Re: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: Soljacic wins $10k MIT Young Scholar Award (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread