[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tesla myths corrected - Best text? (fwd)

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tesla myths corrected - Best text? (fwd)
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:57:38 -0600 (MDT)
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path: <mod1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:57:39 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <Oxy-TtzUjKE.A.16D.jXMGHB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:06:31 -0700
From: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Tesla myths corrected - Best text? (fwd)

So you have added these losses and come to 75kW? I think it is nearer 80 - 
85kW myself.

Peter"

	Try gigawatts and you'll be closer when you work out the numbers for any imagineable inductor Q and ignoring ground loss or shunt currents in the ionized channels due to lightning bolts which come from above the "layer" and continue to the ground.  Remember this "layer" covers the entire earth!

Ed

Prev by Date: Source for cooling? (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: rf damage (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: Tesla myths corrected - Best text? (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: Tesla myths corrected - Best text? (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread