Re: Subject: Re: Current Distribution in inductors (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:27:14 -0700
From: Barton B. Anderson <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Current Distribution in inductors (fwd)

Hi Jared,

I'll reply off the TCML. You and I are off topic. When a coiler ask a 
question; I say "this" and you say "that", which is perfectly normal. 
But when we start going into our theory's and pull away from the context 
of the original thread, we really should take it upon ourselves to take 
it off-line for the sanity of the list. So, I'll do that now.

Take care,
Bart

Tesla list wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:20:07 -0400
> From: Jared Dwarshuis <jdwarshuis@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Pupman <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Subject: Re: Current Distribution in inductors (fwd)
>
> Hi Bart:
>
> The regions in question  have been divided by wire length into (n) regions
> of equal wire length. Thus they are forced by geometry to have the same
> volume, surface area, height.
>
> Energy passing through each partition in an inductor must be the same or
> energy would accumulate;  not possible when the system exhibits
> periodicity.
>
> I hope that our next posting on self resonance will help clarify things a
> bit more.
>
> Jared Dwarshuis and Lawrence Morris
>
>
>
>
>
>