Re: ED Tesla article (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:32:39 -0700
From: Ken or Doris Herrick <kchdlh@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ED Tesla article (fwd)

Yeah, a nastygram is probably a good idea, for what it'd be worth.  I 
didn't pay too much attention to the "witricity" notion but it sure 
seems that there's nothing new in it.  And...that it's hopeless for 
long-distance and efficient transmission of power.  I think I'll not 
trouble to pay it any more attention.

KCH

Tesla list wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:18:32 -0700
> From: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: ED Tesla article (fwd)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 09:31:43 -0700
> From: Ken or Doris Herrick <kchdlh@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Tesla List <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: ED Tesla article
>
> Perhaps someone has already mentioned it...but there's a short, 
> interesting piece on Tesla's wireless-power efforts and their 
> present-day "revival" in Electronic Design mag.  See 
> www.electronicdesign.com.
>
> KCH"
>
> 	Haven't mentioned it but sure did read it and I'm contemplating a nastygram to the editor pointing out that it's hard for me to understand how they can run a decent "electronics" magazine when they don't know anything about electricity or how to read about stuff like "witricity" in a critical manner.  I continue to be amazed by how many publications have been taken in by that junk.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
>
>