RE: [TCML] Sec design trade-offs and considerations

["Lau, Gary" <Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>]

... but not trimmed so much as to remove the context from a reply.  I often see replies to messages with the original post completely gone.  Please retain the *significant* portions of the post to which you are replying or refuting?

Thanks!

Gary Lau
MA, USA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Dave Pierson
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 4:45 AM
> To: Tesla Coil Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [TCML] Sec design trade-offs and considerations
>
> Gentle Suggestion:
> Could 'we', as Chip suggested earlier today, perhaps
> trim postings a bit?
> Specifically as to older material?
>
> Last entry in this thread had 4 lines of new content on top
> of 100 or so lines of 'gee we've all seen that already'.
>
> I'm all in favour of enough context to give context, however
> it is permissible etiquette to trim replies...
>
> Too much olde material means new nuggets of info may be lost.
>
> best
>  dwp

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla