[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCML] Sec design trade-offs and considerations
In a message dated 11/24/2007 7:56:50 A.M. US Eastern Standard Time,
list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>Though using resonance you
>do not necessarily need to run the IGBT's at 50khz or more. This is the
idea
>I am working on with my "high Q design".. I run an SCR which triggers at
>100hz and pumps power into a resonant circuit of 2mhz.. In simulations it
>works great... real world........ Well not sure until I finish building it!
>It is no different really than the 50hz NST pumping into a 100khz primary
>circuit... the spark gap is still make/breaking at 50hz but the frequency
>"through" the device is a lot faster... Actually my SCR design only runs at
>100hz and discharges the tank cap into the primary in less than a single
>cycle so as soon as the current drops in the tank low enough, the SCR turns
>off. Energy is trapped into the primary LC which has a resonance of 2mhz...
>The secondary is also 2mhz so the primary should drain over the next set of
>cycles and charge the secondary as normal.
\
Chris,
It sounds to me that you're planning to use the SCR to replace the spark
gap. The tank will ring down while the SCR is turned *on*. The SCR will
extinguish when the energy rings down sufficiently. If this is what you
plan, it's not a new idea. I've used SCR's in this way in Tesla coils,
Lou B. has done it, Malcolm W. has done that and probably others too.
Terry's SISG coils use the same concept except he used an IGBT which
is kept on during the transfer time. The overall concept being that the
solid state
device is not switched at the RF frequency, but rather at the break-rate
frequency.
John
**************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest
products.
(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla