Re: [TCML] Re: Wireless Energy Transmission Follow-up (fwd)

["Gary Peterson" <g.peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Strictly speaking, all forms of electromagnetic radiation such as X rays, 
light, and radio waves exist as an electromagnetic wave, but not all 
electromagnetic waves are electromagnetic radiation.  One good example of 
electromagnetic wave propagation that is not by means of electromagnetic 
radiation is the flow of electrical energy from one end to the other of an 
RF transmission line, such as coaxial cable.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Mddeming@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [TCML] Re: Wireless Energy Transmission Follow-up (fwd)


> In a message dated 11/12/07 2:29:03 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> g.peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > > I'm still unclear, I fear, on how the 'Tesla coil as  receiver' will 
> > > 'not' pick up the 'conventional' radio  waves.
> >
> > It is my experience that a grounded Tesla coil receiver will  pick up the 
> > emissions of a conventional LF radio transmitter (such as WWV,  Ft. 
> > Collins, Colorado) operating on the same frequency to which the Tesla 
> > coil receiver is tuned.
> >
> > It also appears that a conventional  ungrounded or 'non-counterpoise' 
> > antenna such as a tuned dipole or tuned  loop in free space is receptive 
> > primarily to conventional radio waves and  not so much to the other form 
> > of electromagnetic field energy believed to  be associated with operating 
> > Tesla coil wireless transmission-reception  systems.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gary
>
> Hi Gary,
>
>    Until its existence is established, how does one  determine whether or 
> not an antenna is sensitive to "the other form of  electromagnetic field 
> energy BELIEVED to be associated with operating Tesla  coil wireless 
> transmission-reception systems"?
>
>
> Matt D. 

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla