Re: E.M. theory

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: Mddeming@xxxxxxx 

Hi Paul, Antonio, All,

    In this "New Age", there is nothing so silly that it won't 
attract devotees among the gullible.
Often, the sillier it is, the more steadfast the devotion, especially 
if it claims to turn all known
science upside down.

    Seems like an eternal uphill battle.

Matt D.


In a message dated 3/11/07 6:41:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmdq@xxxxxxxxxx>

Tesla list wrote:
>Original poster: Paul Nicholson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Leith Aitchison wrote:
>
> > Site that may be of interest explaining Einstein Cartan Evans
> > grand unified field theory , simply amazing !!!
>
>Amazing!  You'd think by now that retired chemistry professors
>should know better than to try their hand at physics!
>
>The site reeks of pseudoscience - the self styled 'institute',
>the appeals to authority (Tony Blair no less - renowned for his
>credulity).
>
>Try these links instead,
>
>http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/theoristbad.html
>http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/GCUFT.html
Really impressive how long this madness can go... A quick look at the
site shows obvious nonsense in so many places
that I imagined that the subject would be simply ignored. But no,
this never ends so simply...

Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz






----------
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's 
free from AOL at <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000339>AOL.com.