Re: 180 BPS synch? (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:56:16 -0400
From: Scott Bogard <teslas-intern@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 180 BPS synch? (fwd)

Bart,
     Thanks, I see how bad that configuration is, evidently my gut instinct 
was incorrect.  Thanks for the program, it is very neat, I'm sure it will 
come in handy.
Scott Bogard.


>From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: 180 BPS synch? (fwd)
>Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:28:54 -0600 (MDT)
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:06:50 -0700
>From: Barton B. Anderson <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: 180 BPS synch? (fwd)
>
>Hi Scott,
>
>A 6 electrode 180 Hz firing rate has always been looked at as likely the
>worst of all cases. Haven't tried it myself, but there is an old DOS
>program (1991) by Robert Jamison you might want to run that looks at
>various configurations, and yes, the 6 electrode case is there. It's a
>simple .exe file. It's at my web site if you want to download and run.
>
>http://www.classictesla.com/download/rotjit.zip
>
>Take care,
>Bart
>
>Tesla list wrote:
>
> >---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:19:19 -0400
> >From: Scott Bogard <teslas-intern@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: RE: 180 BPS synch?
> >
> >Nobody responded to my message (not even a "yes, it's been done" or a "no 
>it
> >won't work"), so I'm reposting it on the assumption either nobody got it, 
>or
> >nobody took the time to read it and respond, thanks.
> >Scott Bogard.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: 180 BPS synch? (fwd)
> >>Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 15:05:02 -0600 (MDT)
> >>
> >>
> >>---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:31:13 -0400
> >>From: Scott Bogard <teslas-intern@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: 180 BPS synch?
> >>
> >>Greetings all,
> >>     I was curious, what would the results be of a synchronous motor 
>(1800
> >>rpm) being used with 6 electrodes, for 180 BPS.  My thinking is that the
> >>arc
> >>put out would be slightly more random due to uneven firing voltages, 
>like
> >>an
> >>asynch gap, but prevent dangerous resonant rises, due top it's tenancy 
>to
> >>inevitably repeat a defined patter over and over again (also different
> >>"phasing" may effect output, but I don't think it would ever settle on a
> >>phase it cannot operate with, or one that would give optimum power).  
>Has
> >>anybody tried this, what do you guys think (I just finished building a
> >>120/240 BPS sync, so I don't think I will be building another soon, but
> >>maybe somebody else can try it).  Thanks.
> >>Scott Bogard.
> >>
> >>_________________________________________________________________
> >>Need a brain boost? Recharge with a stimulating game. Play now!
> >>http://club.live.com/home.aspx?icid=club_hotmailtextlink1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Local listings, incredible imagery, and driving directions - all in one
> >place! http://maps.live.com/?wip=69&FORM=MGAC01
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Local listings, incredible imagery, and driving directions - all in one 
place! http://maps.live.com/?wip=69&FORM=MGAC01