[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Undamped oscillations

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Undamped oscillations
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:35:35 -0700
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path: <tcmlmod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:35:48 -0700 (MST)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <ceK7ADecQJE.A.KxC.0lAuFB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: Mddeming@xxxxxxxIn a message dated 1/24/07 12:43:22 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:>I'm still not sure that I would call the result "undamped", but atleast it is more or less CW.

>I wonder just what visibility Tesla had into the actual waveforms?
>


Hi Ed,

It may have been zero visibility. It would not have been out ofcharacter for Tesla to visualize something in such great detail thathe was comfortable to report it as fact, sight unseen.


Matt D.

Prev by Date: Re: REFERENCES ON RADIO, WIRELESS, AND THE TIME IN WHICH TESLA WORKED
Next by Date: Re: Weather/coil performance
Previous by thread: Re: Undamped oscillations
Next by thread: Re: Undamped oscillations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread