[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The MMC debate continues . . . . . .

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: The MMC debate continues . . . . . .
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:52:22 -0700
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path: <tcmlmod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:52:14 -0700 (MST)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <QZwWh1UqDXJ.A.GK.eP72FB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: Slurp812 <slurp812@xxxxxxxxx>

On 2/17/07, Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Original poster: "resonance" <resonance@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



I have played with AC powered TCs for nearly 45 years now and I have
never ever had a shock from a small, medium, or large TC that runs on
AC.


Maybe your not trying hard enough?

:)

J/K of course!!

Prev by Date: Re: calculations of capacitance
Next by Date: Re: Marx Generators
Previous by thread: Re: The MMC debate continues . . . . . .
Next by thread: Re: The MMC debate continues . . . . . .
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread