[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tungsten,2% Thoriated or Pure?



Original poster: "huil888" <huil888@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Terry -

Good to see some "expert" data .....

Interesting that the thorium emission rate (assumed to be directly proportional to ablation rate) is 30X higher in an AC arc vs a DC arc. In all welding work, the arc is tungsten electrode to metal workpiece, where in an RSG the arc is typically tungsten-to-tungsten. Does a tungsten-to-tungsten arc further increase the thorium emission rate?

Also, the current the RSG electrodes see in medium-to-large Tesla coils is much greater than typically seen in TIG welding. However, where the TIG welder is seldom further than 24 inches from his torch, I think the typical observation distance from the RSG in a large coil is more like 24 feet .....

Regards,
Scott


----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 8:08 PM
Subject: RE: Tungsten,2% Thoriated or Pure?


Original poster: Terrell Fritz <terrellfone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The amount of radioactivity is not considered high enough to kill...

http://www.hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q1593.html

Cheers,

        Terry



At 03:40 PM 2/11/2007, you wrote:
Original poster: "Godfrey Loudner" <ggreen@xxxxxxxx>

How do welders protect themselves from thoriated welding rods?

Godfrey Loudner

Original poster: David Speck <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Joe,

The objection to the use of thoriated gap elements is that thorium is
a naturally radioactive alpha particle emitter.  There is a small but
measurable amount of gap erosion during TC operation, with some of
that electrode material being converted to fine airborne radioactive
dust. I think that many coilers are willing to sacrifice a small amount
of
gap efficiency to reduce the risk of lung cancer.
Dave