[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Inverse Square 'law' Re: About wireless energy transfer

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Inverse Square 'law' Re: About wireless energy transfer
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:28:29 -0700
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path: <tcmlmod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:28:27 -0700 (MST)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <XVcMAaoW4aC.A.roF.rtpzFB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: FIFTYGUY@xxxxxxxIn a message dated 2/10/07 6:58:19 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:


>It sounds like the only way to "not have an inverse square
>relationship" is to have a beam that has absolutely NO DIVERGENCE and
>physics would preclude this.

    Wouldn't a *converging* beam have an "inverse inverse square law"?

-Phil LaBudde

Prev by Date: Laser guided Tesla Coil
Next by Date: COIL FOR ELECTROMAGNETS
Previous by thread: Re: Inverse Square 'law' Re: About wireless energy transfer
Next by thread: Re: Inverse Square 'law' Re: About wireless energy transfer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread