Re: [TCML] Another MMC question.

[Jim Lux <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----Original Message-----
>From: "Barton B. Anderson" <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Dec 11, 2007 7:08 PM
>To: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [TCML] Another MMC question.
>
>Hi Michael,
>
>It's not my chart to update (I think Terry F or Mike Everett?), but I 
>did find it for those seeking it at the time and put it up as a document 
>link at my site. I think I'll just take it down since I personally don't 
>agree with it.
>
>It's funny, I argued the case of voltage on MMC's for a long time, but 
>it seemed that 90% of the TCML argued against it. Now I'm hearing just 
>the opposite. I feel vindicated in some respect, but also stupid for 
>throwing the TCML's old MMC chart up for reference.



Science (viz peer review) in action...

Be proud.

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla