Re: TESLA'S WIRELESS TRANSMISSION SCHEME (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:53:18 EDT
From: Mddeming@xxxxxxx
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: TESLA'S WIRELESS TRANSMISSION SCHEME (fwd)

 
Colin,
 
    What a "party pooper"!!  If you continue to  insist on injecting reason 
and reality into otherwise rousing discussions of  longitudinal waves, folks 
will start to suspect you of being a Muggle ;^))
    While for myself, I was unable to see any  connection to longitudinal 
waves in the URL cited below, perhaps we should take  a more Jungian approach. To 
paraphrase old CJ: "If a man claims to have had a  religious experience, the 
only valid conclusion you can draw is that he has had  a religious 
experience." Likewise, if one person claims they have seen a  likeness of Elvis in a 
Rorschach test, or another claims he has seen evidence of  longitudinal waves in 
his TC experiment, you can only conclude, according to  Jung, that that was 
their experience. 
    When a person says,"There is no question in my mind  that I am correct.." 
you must accept that as THEIR reality. That  others do not see a reasonable 
connection does not change this  subjective truth. This is precisely why 
science demands independent,  disinterested corroboration, and in many cases even 
double-blind tests. As Will  Alcock once said, "Convincing yourself of your own 
correctness is trivially  easy. It's that rest of the world that's a bitch and 
a half."
 
Matt D.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 8/1/07 1:48:23 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007  12:40:09 -0500
From: David Thomson <dwt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 'Tesla  list' <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: TESLA'S WIRELESS TRANSMISSION  SCHEME (fwd)

Hi Colin,

> If you want to keep putting forward  the same old line about
longitudinal
> ion/plasma waves in air (which  I believe many on this list consider
to be
> blatant  pseudoscience),

Many on this list do consider it to be pseudoscience,  but that is just
an unfounded personal opinion.  There are others on  this list who see
it as valid, verifiable science.

> then I'd ask  you to reconsider providing an
> explanation for why the easily  demonstrated damping effects of
neutral
> collisions and thermal  motion don't dominate the very weak
electrostatic
> forces between  the low density of ions in air.

I would have to see the actual  experiments you are talking about to
respond to this request.  As for  actual experiments demonstrating
electrostatic standing waves (longitudinal  waves of ions) in a three
coil system, I present my own  work:
http://www.tesla-coil-builder.com/FlatSpiralSolenoidCombo.htm

There  is no question in my mind that I am correct since I can
physically produce  the phenomenon to which I am referring.  Have you
considered that  before forming your own personal opinion?

Dave

David W. Thomson  
Quantum AetherDynamics Institute







************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour