Re: [] Re: 80' - 300' Lightning

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "David Rieben" <drieben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Anthony, all,

That's a nice thought, but would literally require million$
to accomplish in today's economy. Pretty much beyond
the financial reach of most, if not all, of us in absence of
major federal or corporate funding. If any one has the
means and the will to invest into such a project, then by
all means "have at it" and let us know how it comes out. :^)

David

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:44 PM
Subject: RE: [] Re: 80' - 300' Lightning


> Original poster: "Anthony R. Mollner" <penny831@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Yes, and Tesla's Colorado Springs coil was 50 something feet in Diameter,
> well the primary anyways. I wonder why no one else has remade that lab?
Mr.
> Bill Wysock has made that monster one of his but it's still not as big as
> Colorado Springs was. I think all of us should get together and build a
> reproduction of Tesla's lab!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 3:49 PM
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PHISH] Re: 80' - 300' Lightning
>
>
> Original poster: Yurtle Turtle <yurtle_t@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Yeah, and it can make a DOD EMP detector satellite
> think a 10 - 15 ton nuke just went off! Cool!
>
> Adam
>
> --- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   > Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson"
>   > <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   >
>   > Hi Shelton,
>   >
>   > I use CSI pulse caps myself. Excellent cap
>   > manufacturer, but still,
>   > no matter how big the cap is, the remarks about the
>   > spark lengths are
>   > absolutely bogus. The coil just can't do that. The
>   > coil size couldn't
>   > handle the power even if you threw the needed power
>   > at it. The coil
>   > would need to be scaled by at least by 1 magnitude.
>   > The gap, top
>   > load, primary, power supply, etc.. are all not even
>   > in the same
>   > universe as what would be required to do those spark
>   > lengths. It's
>   > probably the dumbest thing I've ever read, but it is
>   > a very nice
>   > looking coil. Other than the ignorant spark length
>   > statements, it's
>   > certainly a nice coil.
>   >
>   > Take care,
>   > Bart
>   >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>