[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: Re: Frequency Splitting*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:30:32 -0600*Delivered-to*: testla@xxxxxxxxxx*Delivered-to*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Old-return-path*: <vardan01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Resent-date*: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:19:02 -0600 (MDT)*Resent-from*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Resent-message-id*: <T52iieY9krO.A.IS.2dIdEB@chip1>*Resent-sender*: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: <a1accounting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi, > Original poster: "Daniel McCauley" <dhmccauley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The resonant points, as you state, are not equidistance from the > resonant peak. Each one is different, and can be defined by > the following equations: > > Fupper = Funcoupled / sqrt (1-k) > > Flower = Funcoupled / sqrt (1+k) > > where k = coupling between the two resonant circuits > Actualy only true for simple (lumped) resonators. A more accurate version for our case would be Fupper = Funcoupled / sqrt (1-k -(k^3)/6..) Flower = Funcoupled / sqrt (1+k+(k^3)/6..) which is an educated guess just to be provocative snip

- Prev by Date:
**Re: SISG PC BOARDS** - Next by Date:
**Re: Bipolar primary design** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Frequency Splitting** - Next by thread:
**Re: Re: Frequency Splitting** - Index(es):