[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: Re: Frequency Splitting*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:27:11 -0600*Delivered-to*: testla@xxxxxxxxxx*Delivered-to*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Old-return-path*: <vardan01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Resent-date*: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:12:23 -0600 (MDT)*Resent-from*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Resent-message-id*: <6-PmSG9vZRI.A.Z9E.nXIdEB@chip1>*Resent-sender*: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>

Dr. Resonance

Original poster: "Daniel McCauley" <dhmccauley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>The resonant points, as you state, are not equidistance from theresonant peak. Each one is different, and can be defined bythe following equations: Fupper = Funcoupled / sqrt (1-k) Flower = Funcoupled / sqrt (1+k) where k = coupling between the two resonant circuits DanThe resonance points occur at two different frequencies eachequidistant from the resonant peak. Maybe frequency splittingisn't the best term but two separate resonant freqs occur withovercoupling which produces two separate points along the coil whenpotential peaks occur. Then, these two pure freqs start "beating"against each other and standing waves occur.Dr. Resonance

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Bipolar primary design** - Next by Date:
**Re: SISG IGBT power loss calculations** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Re: Frequency Splitting** - Next by thread:
**Re: Frequency Splitting** - Index(es):