Re: Power Factor Correction

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "Karl L." <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Scott

I think DC meant to place the "RF hash chokes" in series with each 
leg of the NST SECONDARY, between the xfrmr and "Terry 
filter."  However, if he did actually mean to place them across the 
NST primary, that would certainly eliminate any RF hash.  There 
simply would be none, thus protecting the NST and PFC caps from damage.

Karl

On May 19, 2006, at 11:09 PM, Tesla list wrote:

> Original poster: "Scott Hanson" <huil888@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> DC -
>
> I'm sure you intended to say that you place your "RF hash chokes" in 
> SERIES with each leg of the NST primary, and not "across" the NST 
> primary (which would be a dead short across the primary).
>
> Regards,
> Scott Hanson
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 2:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Power Factor Correction
>
>
> > Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >
> > Use RF hash chokes across the NST pri between the xmfr and the 
> > Terry filter to delete the RF spikes.  Iron core, 2 inch ID PVC 
> > tube, 70 turns #12 AWG on both hot and neutral legs.
> >
> > Dr. Resonance