[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Low-powered coil definition (fwd)



Original poster: Gerry Reynolds <greynolds@xxxxxxxxxx>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:59:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Yurtle Turtle <yurtle_t@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Low-powered coil definition (fwd)

Would you be willing to share the details of your EMI
filters?

thanks
Adam

--- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Original poster: Gerry Reynolds
> <greynolds@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:20:51 -0500
> From: Edward Wingate <ewing7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Low-powered coil definition (fwd)
> 
> Tesla list wrote:
> 
> Gary,
<snip> 
> BUT,
> keep in mind the fact 
> that my power cabinet and any other coil related
> equipment is connected 
> to the line through VERY SUBSTANTIAL EMI filters.
> Even the ground is 
> routed through the filters. To me, EMI filters are a
> must have.
> 
> Before the lab was built, I used the same filtering
> tecniques in the 
> basement while producing 7 foot arcs and suffered no
> damages to anything 
> electronic.
> 
> I am not recommending any of the above, just
> relating what works for me. 
> YMMV!
> 
> Ed Wingate RATCB


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com