[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Low-powered coil definition (fwd)
Original poster: Gerry Reynolds <greynolds@xxxxxxxxxx>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:59:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Yurtle Turtle <yurtle_t@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Low-powered coil definition (fwd)
Would you be willing to share the details of your EMI
filters?
thanks
Adam
--- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Original poster: Gerry Reynolds
> <greynolds@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:20:51 -0500
> From: Edward Wingate <ewing7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Low-powered coil definition (fwd)
>
> Tesla list wrote:
>
> Gary,
<snip>
> BUT,
> keep in mind the fact
> that my power cabinet and any other coil related
> equipment is connected
> to the line through VERY SUBSTANTIAL EMI filters.
> Even the ground is
> routed through the filters. To me, EMI filters are a
> must have.
>
> Before the lab was built, I used the same filtering
> tecniques in the
> basement while producing 7 foot arcs and suffered no
> damages to anything
> electronic.
>
> I am not recommending any of the above, just
> relating what works for me.
> YMMV!
>
> Ed Wingate RATCB
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com