[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mutual Inductance, Self Inductance, Wire Length And The Neumann Equation
Original poster: "Jared Dwarshuis" <jdwarshuis@xxxxxxxxx>
Mutual Inductance, Self Inductance, Wire Length And The Neumann Equation
The Neumann equation reads:
M = u / 4pi closed integral path (a) closed integral path
(b) [ dl(a) dot dl(b) / r ]
We will demonstrate that closed integral paths (a) and (b) are the
lengths of wire used in the inductor or transformer.
Let us examine an air cored solenoid:
Suppose we wind a short coil directly on top of a long coil such that
all of the magnetic flux going through the long coil also must go
through the short coil.
Thus: flux B = pi Rsqrd u N I
Then: M(ab) = N(b) flux (ab) / I(a)
So: M(ab) = u pi Rsqrd N(a) N(b) / a
Now we will multiply the numerator and denominator by 4pi and regroup.
So: M(ab) = u/ 4pi (2pi R N(a) ) (2pi R N(b) ) / a
Or: M(ab) = u/4pi (wire length (a) ) ( wire length (b) ) / a
We can now clearly identify the components of the Neumann equation.
Closed integral path (a) is simply the wire length of solenoid (a)
Closed integral path (b) is simply the wire length of solenoid (b)
1/r is simply 1/a
Now we can write the self inductance of a solenoid as:
L = u (wire length)sqrd / 4pi height
Equivalently:
L = u /4pi height (wire length) (wire length)
(L ) is also in the form of the Neumann equation. This shows that
self inductance is actually a form of mutual inductance.
Now we can write (u ) as: u = 1/ e Csqrd
Then: M = (1 / 4pi e height) (wire length (a) / C ) (wire length (b) / C )
Then: L = (1 / 4pi e height) (wire length / C ) (wire length / C )
(1/ 4pi e height) represents an inverse capacitance based of the
distance our fields have traversed through the permittivity of free space
(wire length / C) gives units of time
With (M) we can have two different wire length, with (L) we have a
single wire length that must be squared.
End derivation.
A very brief overview of considerations regarding M and L
When we have a primary around the secondary of a Tesla coil, we can
no longer simply call the primary or secondary a self inductance.
Because we are coupled to a second set of windings it is now properly
called M ( a mutual inductance)
Perhaps you have noticed that the primary tap points calculated using
f = 1/ 2pi sqrt(LC) can be off significantly. This is especially
true for tightly coupled coils.
As we couple a coil more tightly, the primary/secondary interaction
starts to become more M like, and less like two separate( L). When
a coil is tightly coupled we will need more primary turns than
calculated using: f = 1/ 2pi sqrt(LC).
A tightly coupled coil depends on the extra turns that we added to
accumulate 'leakage inductance'. It is the sum of the uncoupled
inductance that we need for resonance. Uncoupled inductance means
self coupled (the magnetic field is self contained within the inductor).
A very lightly coupled coil has so little M to consider that we can
ignore the term entirely and pretend that both primary and secondary
are entirely L. The magnetic field for a lightly coupled coil has a
weak interaction between primary and secondary so it is essentially
self coupled and behaves as a self inductance.
Sincerely:
Jared Dwarshuis
Dec. 06