RE: Physics of Wireless Transmission

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "David Thomson" <dwt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Terry, Bob, and all,

I have found a web page that presents the mathematics behind
relativistic charge:
http://physics.weber.edu/schroeder/mrr/MRRtalk.html

You will note in equation 3 it says, "The expression in
parentheses must be the magnetic field strength."  When you work
out the actual dimensions for the term in the parentheses, you
get mass per time, which is not the unit of magnetic field
strength.

How can we trust physics where we have to second guess what
nature actually intended to convey?  I think if you are rational
about this, you'll agree this is a serious flaw in the theory and
that magnetism has not been proved to be relativistic
electrostatic charge.

This conclusion would also explain why this simple calculation is
not widely known.  People have a hard time explaining why nature
is so precise with its dimensions in every other calculation, but
makes an exception in this one instance.

Dave