Re: Multiple secondary coils

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: gary350@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Well, I did that too.  When I first started experementing I just 
picked up what ever scrap PVC was laying around and put some wire on 
it.  I later tried some different things.




-----Original Message-----
>From: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Apr 9, 2006 12:13 PM
>To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Multiple secondary coils
>
>Original poster: dest <dest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Hallo Gary.
>
> > Original poster: gary350@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Several years ago I did some experements and posted the results
> > here.  Not sure if anyone remembers.
>
>i remember - just read about this about week or so ago : )
>
> > I built 3 secondary coils exactly identical only difference was, #1
> > coil had 1 layer of #24 enamel coater copper wire 950 turns, #2 coil
> > was identical but it has another coil would over the 1st coil both
> > coils were connected in parallel.
>
>hmm - my data don`t correlate well with yours - something is wrong here
>% )
>
>1997\june\msg00618.html
>
>"I made 3 secondary coils exactly the same physical size but each coil
>is wound differently.  All coils are wound on 4" PVC pipe 13.5" long.
>
>Secondary coil # 1 is 4.5" dia x 13" long.  #24 wire.   600 turns.
>12284 uh.  548 KHZ.  16.6 ohms.  Close wound single layer.
>
>Secondary coil # 2 is 4.5" dia x 13" long.  #24 wire.  600 turns.
>12284 uh.  548 KHZ.  8.3 ohms.  Close wound.   2 coils each 600 turns
>with one coil wound over the other.  The 2 coils are connected in
>parallel."
>
> > I built a tesla coil with 3 secondary coils in parallel.  All 3 coils
> > were wound on 4" PVC pipe with 950 turns of #24 wire.   This tesla
> > coil was compaired to an identical tesla coil with only 1 secondary
> > coil.
>
>again -  i have another info on this : )
>
>1997\october\msg00557.html
>
>"I connected 3 secondary coils in parallel and found they perform just
>as well as one large diameter secondary coil, with some advantages.
>All 3 secondary coils are 4.5" dia. x 13"long, 602 turns of #24 wire."
>
> > That was 5 years ago maybe longer I am not sure where my notes are.
>
>a-ha, maybe that was another set of experiments, more recent, then i
>must go and read further : )
>
>p.s.
>have you any web site this time up and running? the old link is dead.
>
>-----
>If you're not part of the solution, then your part of the problem!
>08-05-97 (c) Bert Pool
>
>