[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tesla Coil RF Transmitter
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Tesla Coil RF Transmitter
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:34:40 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:36:34 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <0JlGqB.A._8B.SWeODB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
You can't synthesize it the same way. But, you can get arbitrarily
close with an infinite network and large loss.
Jim Lux
-----Original Message-----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subj: Re: Tesla Coil RF Transmitter
Date: Tue Sep 27, 2005 4:23 pm
Size: 501 bytes
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>I heard him say
>>that, using only PASSIVE RC circuits, it was possible to synthesize any
>>transfer function shape
I don't believe it! Some transfer functions need complex poles, and
RC circuits can only give real poles no matter how many you string
together. The "classic resonance curve" Jim Lux mentioned is the
simplest example of a transfer function that can only be made with
complex poles.
Steve Conner
http://www.scopeboy.com/