[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Golka's Wendover "secret" gap
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Golka's Wendover "secret" gap
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:03:39 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:06:10 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <iGc7vB.A.T8G.QHVODB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Russell L Thornton <Russell.L.Thornton@xxxxxxxx>
Greetings All,
As a temporary lurker here I usually refrain from comments and leave
it to the experts. However in the case of SF6 I do have some experience.
I have 17 years of radar experience with the Air Force and we use it
in the waveguides of high powered radars. The purpose is to provide
additional insulation above normal compressed air or
nitrogen. Typically our pressures are lower than the 45 PSI
mentioned in Jim's website. I don't have a copy of the curves with
me but I believe that increasing the pressure asymptotically
approaches a limiting insulation effect. My main point is that the
idea is to NOT have an arc in our systems. If an arc does occur it
converts the SF6 into a white power that must be removed by
maintenance before resuming operation. I cannot imagine designing a
system that continuous exposed SF6 to arcing. Maybe that is why it
was a secret!
An alternative that I noticed in the Reference Data For Radio
Engineers is Freon 12 ( I know, It's an old copy). However, R134a is
still real similar to its predecessor and may exhibit similar
insulating characteristics. It might be worth some
experimentation. Then that could be a secret!
Cheers,
Russ
Aerospace Corporation