[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Noob question
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Noob question
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 22:06:16 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 22:10:01 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <a5SvlD.A.ncF.YS3NDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Jim,
If it doesn't emit output sparks you may find yourself
burning up primary components in short order.
Malcolm
On 25 Sep 2005, at 17:04, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: Jim Fraley <trib35man@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> > Original poster: Terry Fritz
> <vardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > At 11:25 AM 9/25/2005, you wrote:
> >
> >> Hi group.
> >> I am quite new here. just been soaking it up
> for a
> >> few days. I do
> >> have a question about general coil construction. I
> am
> >> wanting to build a
> >> "small" Tesla Coil according to the patents.
> >
> >
> > Cool!! But which patents? All of Tesla'a patents
> were for fairly
> > large machines and are sort of out of date by 100
> years ;-) But there
> > are plenty of ways of making coils today....
>
> Hmm.. I guess I'm talking about 593,138, but with the
> addition of the
> spark gap or tube switch driven by solid state
> electronics.
>
> >
> >> I am
> >> shooting for 20kHz as
> >> my resonant freq. (for a specific application which
> >> many of you can
> >> probably guess).
> >
> >
> > That is a very low frequency in general but probably
> possible. "I"
> > can't guess what it is for?
> >
> Dr. Tesla said that 20kHz was an upper end of
> operation, that higher
> frequencies might be practicable. Today we see coils
> at much higher
> frequencies. But his invention brought radiant energy
> (aetheric) into
> 3-d space. This is what I am after. I don't believe
> the coils built for
> light shows today conform to Dr. Tesla's specification
> (which he
> stressed must be followed) and so are useful only for
> lightning shows. I
> want to tap the Radiant energy in the Natural medium.
>
> I chose the frequency of 20 kHz as a starting point
> because that's near
> the frequency Stanley Meyer was working at. Can you
> guess now what i'm
> after? ;-)
>
> Dr Peter Lindemann's book, "Free energy secrets of
> Cold Electricity"
> draws close parallels between the thestatika machine,
> the EV Gray motor,
> and Tesla's coils. Since it's probably easier to wind
> a coil than to
> build a van degraaf generator and leyden jars and all
> the kit, or to
> copy Edwin Gray's converter tube, I am exploring this
> route to tap the
> aether. Ideally my coil will sit in the corner of a
> room, completely
> quietly filling its collector plate with a positive
> electrical charge
> and providing at least some electricity for my home.
> It is in a sense
> the antithesis of most coils built by people on this
> list. If anyone has
> tried this already, I would love to hear from him and
> learn from his
> experience.
>
> >> I figured the secondary has to be
> >> about 2.35 mi. in
> >> length.
> >
> >
> > That is the 1/4 wave length of 20kHz... For Tesla
> coils, the 1/4 wave
> > length is really NOT important. But it will take
> about that much wire
> > to wind a coil with that low of frequency.
> >
>
> I hope no one is offended by my definition of Tesla
> coil, but it doesn't
> include anything not built to his spec, as closely as
> is practicable.
> His machines were pure non-oscillating DC impulse
> driven. He spoke of
> "tens of thousands of horsepower" and of a return of
> 1000 times the
> input energy.
>
> >> I am not looking for spark length out of this
> >> pup,
> >
> >
> > Wha!! =:O
> >
> I seek to build a coil that will not even emit a
> spark, which Tesla said
> was wasted power.
>
> >> rather a
> >> proof-of-concept WRT radiant energy.
> >
> >
> > :o)
> >
> Ahh, you understand.
>
> >> Are there
> >> references available that
> >> would assist a person with "modest" mathematical
> >> ability in constructing
> >> a suitable coil?
> >
> >
> > If you want to radiate power, a Tesla coil is
> probably a poor choice.
> > There is a discussion going on about "Tesla Coil RF
> Transmitter"...
> >
> Radiant power in the aetheric sense. A true Tesla coil
> (according to
> Tesla's patent cited above) does not emit Hertzian
> radio waves, but
> something of a different nature entirely. Radiant
> energy which can be
> picked up by copper plates and used to drive a load
> and then the other
> wire goes to ground. Brilliant, actually, and probably
> more related to
> Nathan Stubblefield's work than Marconi's.
>
> > In short, conventional Tesla coils "contain" their
> fields very well
> > and really don't allow the power "out" very far.
> Tesla's great world
> > power system is "usually" believed to not be
> workable and has serious
> > flaws.
> >
>
> "If I can't put a meter on it, There's no way I am
> backing it", Mr.
> Westinghouse said.
>
> > There are programs and as much math as you want for
> designing Tesla
> > coils, it is pretty easy for the most part.
> >
>
> wow, great. where do i find the proggies?
>
> >> I want to follow Tesla's patent as
> >> much as possible
> >> (conical secondary and all). How do I figure the
> >> capacitance i need for
> >> the beastie?
> >
> >
> > The primary capacitance is mostly determined by how
> you are powering
> > the coil. The primary coil can easily be adjusted
> as needed. It
> > would help if we knew exactly which patent you are
> following?
> >
> 593,138
> I'll be powering it with wall current, run up to about
> 4kv and through a
> bridge rectifier. Then I am considering using either a
> vacuum triode (if
> i can find one that will switch fast enough) or a
> counterrotating spark
> gap for the disruptor. the capacitor and disruptor are
> described in the
> patent text but the illustration doesn't show it.
> Lindemann's book
> includes it. (figure 21 in chapter 3)
>
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Terry
> >
>
> thanks for your quick and thoughtful response!
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Jim