[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: electric strength for "x" cm of "y" material
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: electric strength for "x" cm of "y" material
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:27:54 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:34:51 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <SW2mRD.A.J9C.XdPJDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: FIFTYGUY@xxxxxxx
In a message dated 9/11/05 2:32:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
>It increases towards the field strength of the total gap,
>multiplied by the dielectric constant of the poly.
Annoying that with higher frequencies, there's no insulators,
just better or worse capacitors.
You just need to find a really good insulator with a unity
dielectric constant - sub-unity would be nice :). A dissipation
factor of zero would be convenient, also.
Doesn't Dr. Resonance advocate an auto-transformer configuration
for magnifier primary/secondary? Pardon me if I'm misquoting... And
to make the tuning tap points off the outside/bottom of the primary,
furthest from the top of the secondary?
-Phil LaBudde