[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Capacitor in series or parallel?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Capacitor in series or parallel?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 18:40:43 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 18:46:16 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <qthnWD.A.FhD.On4HDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Mddeming@xxxxxxx
In a message dated 9/7/05 11:33:06 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
The usual answer to this is that you connect the power
supply across the spark gap, in order to minimize the
amount of RF fed back into the transformer. This is a
moot point though: spark gaps generate RF too.
Steve Conner
Hi Steve,
I must disagree; it is not a moot point. the RF voltage seen by the
power transformer is several orders of magnitude less with the gap
across the transformer. With transformer across the gap, the
transformer sees only the RF voltage drop across the gap WHILE the
gap is firing, essentially a few hundred volts instead of ~20+ KV.
IMHO, a mouse and a moose are both mammals but not equivalent if
they're stepping on you, and it is a disservice to a newbie to
intimate that they are quantitatively similar..
Matt D.