[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tesla Receiver Coil ..........success?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Tesla Receiver Coil ..........success?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:40:22 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:42:00 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <fePfB.A.MfC.mmUYDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dan" <DUllfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Was the coil tuned to the resonant frequency of the earth?
Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>Tesla list
To: <mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: Tesla Receiver Coil ..........success?
Original poster: Steve Conner <<mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> I have not yet worked out relationship between the
> signal strength as
> it appears on the S meter
<http://www.astrosurf.org/lombry/qsl-db-power-units.htm>http://www.astrosurf.org/lombry/qsl-db-power-units.htm
S-meter calibration varies widely between different
models of radio, but according to this site S5 is
about -97dBm, that is -97dB relative to one milliwatt.
So you received about 200 picowatts of power.
To put that into perspective, if you charged a
lossless capacitor or battery with your 200 picowatts,
after a whole year of charging 24/7 you would have
enough energy to light a LED for one millisecond.
This is why I (and many others) say that wireless
power transmission using Tesla apparatus isn't
efficient enough to be any practical use.
Steve Conner
<http://www.scopeboy.com/>http://www.scopeboy.com/