[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New type of coil needs a name...
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: New type of coil needs a name...
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 22:24:34 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- In-reply-to: <1ac.41f1b698.3084774d@aol.com>
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- References: <1ac.41f1b698.3084774d@aol.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 22:25:01 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <UcIxHC.A.FoF.deyUDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Terry Fritz <vardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,
I am thinking DF-DRSSTC...
"D"irect - "F"eedback - DRSSTC... That would denote that the
"feedback" is "direct"... Could also stand for Duh Fritz DRSSTC
:o))) I kind if hesitate on "Terry" or "Fritz" coils since that kind
of limits me on the many many other coils I am still "going" to come
up with :o))) Like FritzCoil #26465 :o))) I am also sort of
bashfull :%)) and if it turns out to be a big flop, I don't want
"my name" near it :D
If one makes a coil system driven just from the SIDAC Trigger
Circuit, maybe "SIDAC Tesla Coil"... I really do wonder now if an X
by Y "array" of SIDACs could run a BIG coil... They are spooky
devices that we might have way underestimated!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cheers,
Terry
At 09:41 PM 10/16/2005, you wrote:
In a message dated 10/16/05 11:12:23 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
Original poster: "Peter Terren" <pterren@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
The essence of the circuit and it's beauty is the lack of specific
driver circuitry.
I would suggest DriverLess DRSSTC = DL-DRSSTC
Peter