[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recent s.s.t.c work
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Recent s.s.t.c work
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:52:39 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:52:47 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <do7T7B.A.yqB.vusUDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "K. C. Herrick" <kchdlh@xxxxxxx>
Back to the workbench for a little while: I find little phase shift
in the 1:1 c.m. choke I use for a transformer. Instead, there seems
to be quite a bit in the "pilot oscillator" circuit when it's being
used as the feed-thru path for the feedback signal. I have to get
rid of that scheme & instead, bypass that oscillator with the
feedback signal. Happily, I see a way to do that with a couple of
unused logic gates currently on the board. Just have to do a little
more re-wirewrapping...and debugging, of course.
Sean Taylor: Your microprocessor scheme would be daunting for this
old analog has-been. (I was called that, in sardonic jest, by a
collegue over 40 years ago & the expression still entertains me.)
One could easily generate logic-level pulses at primary-current and
bridge-supply-current sign changes, using the standard EX-OR gate
circuit. Then the trick would be to make a delay or control circuit
that would bring those pulses into coincidence. Beyond that, I
haven't yet thought anything thru. Except for the above, to see if I
can make my scheme "good enough".
KCH