Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Bart,
Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson" <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hopefully the same one your using.
Rf = [2pi*N^2*a* effective_rho*(sinh(2theta)+sin(2theta)) ] / [effective_sd*Lw*(cosh(2theta)-cos(2theta)) ]
I assume you ask because you are getting something different?
I didn't put theta in radians. The equation appears to be a classic cos(radians(x)), etc... but I got something off in nevernever land when I set it up. I then removed rads and Q popped up where expected. I left it that way.
I have noted that eff_sD is quite a bit higher than other approximations make.
I'm in the middle of entering coils into the spreadsheet and currently going through Malcolms data concentrating mainly on the closewound coils. A day or so ago I entered Kurt Schraners' data as he made quite a few precise measurements of different h/d coils. I'll send my spreadsheet your way once I get some of Malcolms data logged. I could sure use a check on the implementation.
Sounds good.
Take care, Gerry R.